Is the New Macbook Pro Suitable for Video Editing?

Should You Buy the 2016 Macbook Pro for Video Editing?

is the 15 inch macbook pro right for video editors

Is the new Macbook Pro with Touch Bar right for video editors?

Is the 15″ Macbook Pro cut out to be my next professional work laptop?

Should I wait for the 2017 Macbook Pro?

If you’re trying to decide whether or not to buy the new 2016 Macbook Pro for video editing, then I feel your pain!

Like many editors I’ve been waiting patiently (ish) for Apple to release a new Macbook Pro laptop and I was eagerly anticipating getting my hands on a sleek and powerful new machine.

That almost happened. Now I’m in two minds as to whether to snap one up, or wait a little longer.

Hopefully the following resources and reviews will help you make up your own mind!

This 3 minute review from Wired sets the stage for most people’s complaints, the general situation and the Touch Bar.

My general purchasing philosophy is to buy the best I can and keep it for as long as I can, rather than trying to keep pace with every new iteration, so I don’t mind things being ‘expensive’ as long as I can keep working with them for a good few years to come.

I too was disappointed by the design choice for thinner and lighter, over power and performance. That said, the new screen is ‘the best’ they’ve ever put into a laptop and is a thing of real beauty. The speakers sound much better and the new Touch Bar could even turn out to be useful! (You can see a fistful of hands-on videos below for more on this.)

I don’t even mind the lack of ports, per se. In that, the machine can drive two separate displays, two raids and still charge itself. I’ve been waiting for Thunderbolt 3 too, because it opens up a world of external GPU possibilities.

Anyway, as of today I’m still on the fence.

I can afford to wait a little longer to see if circulating rumours about a 2017 price drop and RAM bump to 32GB, turn out to be true (or not!).

This official Apple launch video will take you through the design, performance and new features of the 2016 Macbook Pro in just over 3 minutes.

For a blow-by-blow breakdown of the new laptop and the technical fine detail behind each component you really can’t be the MacRumors.com buying guide here.

Can You Edit 4K Video on the New 2016 Macbook Pro?

video editing on macbook pro with touch bar

If I was going to buy one today, I’d spring for the 15″ Macbook Pro in Space Grey (why not) with the upgraded Processor (2.9Ghz i7), Graphics Card (Radeon Pro 460) and a 1TB SSD drive (which is supposed to be incredibly fast). This comes to £3,329/$3,499

Why would I do that?

Because of the following real-world test and reviews.

This article from FCPX Editor Thomas Grove Carter is written from the perspective of someone who has actually used the new Macbook Pro to edit with.

So rather than speculating about specs, he’s had the chance to test it out on real jobs. And he think’s it’s more than adequate.

First off, It’s really fast. I’ve been using the MacBook Pro with the new version of FCP X and cutting 5k ProRes material all week, it’s buttery smooth. No matter what you think the specs say, the fact is the software and hardware are so well integrated it tears strips off “superior spec’d” Windows counterparts in the real world. This has always been true of Macs. If you’re running software with old code which doesn’t utilise the hardware well, you’re not going to get great performance

He even likes the Touch Bar!

The more I’ve used it the more I’ve replaced certain keyboard shortcuts. Why would I use dual-hand/multi-finger shortcuts if the button was there in front of me? And it’s contextual. It changes depending on what I’m doing. I’m editing picture; it shows me relevant trimming shortcuts. I’m editing titles; it shows me font, formatting and colour options. All without the need to open other menus. It works, it’s faster and it’s more productive.

So although Thomas is cutting in FCPX (and I spent the majority of my time in Adobe Premiere Pro), he’s getting real world video editing use out of it and he loves it. A helpful reassurance!

If you’re also an Adobe Premiere Pro editor scroll down for another surprising and reassuring speed test in the next section!

best adaptors for 2016 macbook pro

If I do buy a new laptop, I’d also have to snap up one of these Dongle/Adaptor strips to make everything else work. This one from Satechi looks pretty good. It’s got actual USB ports, Ethernet, pass-through charging, a card reader or two and 4K HDMI. All from one USB-C Thunderbolt 3 port.

Like I said before, I don’t mind being pushed in to the future a little bit, as long as I can slap on an adaptor until everyone else catches up. I still even use the FW800 port on my desktop USB hub.

UPDATE – There’s a great, forward thinking post by Adam Geitgey on the multitude of possibilities that the new Macbook Pro’s USB-C connections offer to the ‘hacker’ minded user.

I’m not here to change your mind about the MacBook Pro. Yes, it’s probably too expensive and more RAM is better than less RAM. But everyone posting complaints without actually using a MBP for a few weeks is missing out on all the clever things you can do because it is built on USB-C.

Over the past week or two with a new MacBook Pro (15in, 2.9ghz, TouchBar), I’ve been constantly surprised with how USB-C makes new things possible.

It’s a kind of a hacker’s dream.

NLE Speed Tests on New 2016 Macbook Pro

If you want to get a sense of the power of optimised software for specific hardware then these excellent video comparisons from Jonathan Morrison will deliver just that. This optimisation is what editor Thomas Grove Carter was talking about, above.

In this tech review Jonathan compares the new 13″ Macbook Pro to the HP Spectre. He exports a 5 minute video clip from FCPX on the Macbook Pro and the same 5 minute clip from Adobe Premiere Pro on the Spectre. The FCPX/Macbook Pro combination is much faster, and that’s his point. It’s not an apples-to-apples comparison but it does demonstrate what the machine can do.

The results, and the later SSD and speaker comparison are well worth the 6 minute watch.

Adobe Premiere Pro on the 2016 Macbook Pro

In this updated video Jonathan reviews the 15″ Macbook Pro specifically. Helpfully he runs some ‘real-world’ benchmark tests including duplicating files to the internal SSD, playing video games, transcoding and exporting files in Adobe Premiere and FCPX.

He also covers the Touch Bar and the current limitations of the Macbook Pro – mainly the need for adaptors/dongles. Ultimately Jonathan recommends thinking of the new Macbook Pro as the version 1.0 of the 2016 Macbook Pro.

So unless you really have to, he recommends not rushing out to buy one just yet.

2015 macbook pro vs 2016 macbook pro in Premiere Pro

Here Jonathan took 2 minutes of RED 5K RAW footage and exported it to a 4K H.264 file inside of Adobe Premiere Pro. He also runs a similar test in FCPX which again delivered faster results on the new Macbook Pro.

These kind of performance improvements go along way to making me think that the 2016 Macbook Pro would be a real boost compared to my ageing 17″ Macbook Pro.

In the final video from Jonathan demonstrates how to set up your edit suite around a Macbook Pro with some very aesthetically pleasing gear.

My take aways from his gear set up were the Samsung T3 portable SSD drive (also recommended by Thomas Grove Carter) which he mounts to the back of his monitor. The HooToo USB-C hub (also in Space Grey) mounted under the front of the desk is also a great idea.

But I’ve never seen an edit suite ever look that clean and tidy. Never.

UPDATE – 2016 Macbook Pro vs 2015 Macbook Pro

If you’re looking for a very in-depth comparison of the 15″ Macbook Pro from 2016 and 2015 then this 17 minute video from Max Yuryev.

Max compares all of the major benchmarking tools, temperature gauges and more, as well as some ‘real world’ testing with both FCPX and Premiere Pro.

2015 Macbook Pro vs 2016 Macbook Pro

Max is coming from a video editor’s perspective and also loves to get into the technical details of how the machines can perform and what they can achieve under different scenarios.

Max concludes that if you’re an FCPX editor then you should run out and buy the new Macbook Pro for the performance gains. He also thinks that the hoopla over the lack of ports and the use of dongles, isn’t as big a deal as everyone is making it out to be.

Well worth a watch if you’re considering purchasing. Max also suggests springing for the upgraded graphics card over the upgraded CPU.

2016 Macbook Pro Vs Razer Blade Vs Dell XPS

Thunderbolt 3 Macbook Pro Speed Tests

Jarred Land, President of the RED Digital Cinema Company, has run some speed tests on ‘America’s finest Thunderbolt 3 Laptops’, which includes the 15″ 2016 Macbook Pro with Touch Bar, The new 14″ Razer Blade and the 2016 Dell XPS 15″.

You can check out the full specs of each machine in Jarred’s first post, but he’s recently shared some early numbers and thoughts after having worked with each of the laptops for a while.

1 min 8K 2:1 to 16 Bit 4k DPX FULL Quality render time:

Old Macbook Pro 2015 – 10 min 58 seconds
Dell XPS 15 – 8 min 58 sec.
New Macbook pro 2016 – 7min 52sec .
Razer Blade internal GTX 1060 – 7min 12sec
Razer Blade + Razer Core + GTX1080. – 6 min 20sec
Razer Blade + Razer Core + RedRocket-X – 0 min 59 sec.
12 core Trashcan 128gb mem – 3min -15sec.
PC 10 core 3ghz w GTX 1080 128gb mem – 2min 25sec.

It’s revealing that the Razer Blade beats out the 2016 Macbook Pro by 40 seconds just from it’s own internal GPU, and at a $2000 discount! (The MBP Jarred tests is the full spec’d $4299 machine vs the $2399 Razer Blade)

Jarred had this to say about the Macbook Pro specifically:

Macbook Pro 2016
—–
Most expensive.. by far.. and as much as I want to hate it.. it is the one I find myself picking up for pretty much everything.
Best screen of the bunch. Awesome for Photoshop. Awesome for web and email and FCPX seems to be faster than it should be.
Battery life great. And I love the keyboard that everyone else seems to hate.
Thunderbolt 3 integration is a clusterfuck. As in it just doesn’t work. But eventually if they fix that..look out.
Its great being able to charge the laptop from any of the ports on either the left and right side.
Touch bar adds an extra step to do pretty much anything. I miss the old keys.
Internal SSD (2TB on mine) is stupid fast. Stupid Stupid Stupid fast.
Love you Apple but Fuck you Apple for taking away the SD slot. That screwed me so many times this weekend.
And it’s why I don’t have a photo for this post.

Am I going to buy the 2016 Macbook Pro?

should i buy the new macbook pro for video editing?

For now, I think I’ll wait to see what happens next…. Unless my laptop dies before another refresh occurs.

It does look like a very capable machine for video editing and would be miles faster than my current machine. Also it will be interesting to see where the development of the Touch Bar goes, Apple obviously has a vested interest in making it work with as many applications as possible! It’s great that DaVinci Resolve was also mentioned in the launch keynote.

Hands on with the New Macbook Pro Touch Bar

In this first video from FCP.co editor Peter Wiggins you can get a really good hand’s on look at the new Touch Bar inside of FCPX 10.3.

It’s interesting to see the matte finish to the Touch Bar and I hope the customisation that was demoed in the product launch video extends to specific apps as well.

FCPX Touch Bar Controls

Premiumbeat.com’s always great value blog has a nice write up on the new features in FCPX and how to use them in conjunction with the all new Macbook Pro laptops with Touch Bar.

Running on the new MacBook Pro, Apple claims a 76% increase in editing speed and up to 57% faster 4K 3D title rendering.

The post also includes feature demonstration videos from Apple’s official FCPX page, which is handy if you’ve not seen them!

There are a few more videos coming from the Cupertino demo of editor’s playing with the new Touch Bar in FCPX 10.3

In this short video you can see editor Thomas Grove Carter experimenting with the Touch Bar functionality too.

5 Comments

  • In my opinion the performance gains aren’t good enough to offset the increase in cost. When it comes to their pro products their priorities are a little skewed to the point where they’ll gladly put in underpowered components to ensure they can get away with making it thinner and lighter.

    • Interesting. Have you experienced these “performance gains” in order to judge them inadequate? If so, can you tell me what’s lacking? What processes do you need to accomplish that this machine is too slow at preforming?

      After nearly 30 years of actual editing – I’ve discovered that sometimes, it’s more important to match the tool to the real world task, rather than just buying the heaviest rig with the biggest engine available.

      Basically, a fast trip across a winding road, might be better taken in a well balanced sports car with power properly matched to it’s it’s body weight — rather than in with a truck — even if the truck has significantly more power?

      Just sayin’

  • Incidentally I can edit perfectly fine on a 5 year old MBP. But I do other things that require a better balance between portability and power. And quite honestly a touch strip on a MBP will not increase my productivity to the point where it can offset the cost of the equipment and the performance loss (outside of editing). On top of that their glacial approach to hardware updates does me no favours.

    In short: Apple machines are simply not worth it for me anymore.

Leave a Comment